| Markets in the third quarter of 2019 looked surprisingly similar to the second quarter as more U.S.-China trade war uncertainty and a lack of clarity on future interest rate policy caused a sharp increase in volatility in the middle of the quarter, but the S&P 500 remained resilient and ultimately recouped those losses to finish the quarter not far from the new all-time highs established in late July. The third quarter started strong as news of a “trade truce” between the U.S. and China, which was announced at the G20 meeting in late June, combined with better-than-expected second-quarter corporate earnings to propel the S&P 500 to new all-time highs in July. Also helping markets rally was anticipation of the first interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve since 2008, which became reality on July 31st when the FOMC cut the Fed Fund Rate by 25 basis points. But that strong start to the quarter was quickly undone in early August thanks to increased tariffs between the U.S. and China (the trade truce was short-lived), uncertainty over future Fed policy, and concerning signals from the bond market regarding economic growth and inflation. The U.S.-China trade truce that was agreed to in late June didn’t last much more than a month as President Trump announced new 10% tariffs on $300 billion worth of Chinese imports on August 1st, citing a failure by the Chinese to fulfill promises to increase purchases of U.S. agricultural products. Then, in late August, China retaliated by levying various new tariffs on $75 billion worth of U.S. imports, and President Trump immediately responded by increasing existing tariffs on all $550 billion of Chinese imports. The tariff tit-for-tat weighed on markets throughout August. Also pressuring stocks in August was uncertainty regarding U.S. monetary policy. As mentioned, the Fed cut interest rates by 25 basis points on July 31st, but they did not definitively signal more rate cuts were coming, and disappointment from that lack of clear guidance, combined with growing worries over future economic growth, added to the volatility in August. Finally, a closely watched part of the U.S. Treasury yield curve, the “10s-2s spread,” inverted (meaning that yields on shorter-term notes exceeded those of longer-term notes) for the first time since 2007. This signal has historically preceded a recession by an average of 18 months, although admittedly, it’s not a perfect indicator. Regardless, seeing this signal for the first time in over a decade led to a deterioration in investor sentiment and added to the August volatility. Despite this trifecta of headwinds, markets again showed impressive resilience in the final month of the quarter, just as they did in the second quarter of 2019. Early in September, there was improvement in U.S.-China trade relations as President Trump authorized a short delay on the implementation of some of the recently announced tariff increases, and both the U.S. and China agreed to face-to-face meetings in October in another attempt to end the now 18-plus-month trade war. Additionally, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates for a second time on September 18th and clearly signaled more willingness for future cuts if conditions warranted further action. Finally, after a brief period of being inverted, the yield curve normalized in early September in part due to better-than-expected U.S. economic data and subsequently easing concerns of a future recession. Due to the improving market fundamentals listed above, the S&P 500 rebounded solidly in September and came close to matching July’s all-time highs, although the initiation of an impeachment investigation by the House of Representatives on President Trump caused a modest pullback late in the month. In sum, the volatility we witnessed in the third quarter, which remains historically typical, was not surprising due to the numerous macroeconomic uncertainties facing this market and the economy. But the third quarter was also a reminder that volatility does not automatically mean poor performance. Resilient corporate earnings, stable U.S. economic growth and an accommodative Federal Reserve combined with rising optimism towards U.S.-China trade to offset the volatility and deliver another quarter of positive returns. Third-Quarter Performance Review – Defensive Sectors Outperform Major index returns were somewhat mixed in the third quarter as three of the four major indices, the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100 and Dow Jones Industrial Average, finished the quarter with positive returns, while the Russell 2000 saw negative returns. That mixed performance largely reflected the deterioration in U.S.-China trade relations and rising concerns about global economic growth. By market capitalization, large caps once again outperformed small caps, which is a continuation of the trend witnessed in the second quarter. Large-cap outperformance was partially due to investors reacting to rising future recession fears, as large caps are historically less sensitive to a slowing economy. From an investment style standpoint, growth outperformed value due to strength in consumer sectors, industrials and large-cap tech. On a sector level, eight of the 11 S&P 500 Index sectors finished the third quarter with positive returns. But in a departure from the first two quarters of 2019, traditional defensive stock sectors with high dividend yields (like utilities and REITS) handily outperformed. Falling Treasury yields and concerns about future economic growth fueled the outperformance of these higher-yielding sectors. Sector laggards, meanwhile, were the same as the second quarter. The energy sector experienced negative returns again thanks to further declines in the price of oil and the healthcare sector was pressured by continued political risks via increasing calls for the expansion of government healthcare programs, dubbed “Medicare for all,” and consistent, yet so far unsuccessful efforts by the government to lower the cost of prescription drugs. |
| Looking internationally, foreign markets saw negative returns in the third quarter thanks primarily to concerns about global economic growth. Foreign developed markets declined but relatively outperformed emerging markets due to the European Central Bank cutting interest rates and restarting its quantitative easing (QE) program for the first time since September of 2018. Emerging markets, meanwhile, saw moderate declines thanks to concerns about global economic growth, combined with pressures from a stronger U.S. dollar. |
| Commodities again experienced mixed returns as gold continued to surge and hit fresh multi-year highs while oil declined. Gold rallied in the third quarter thanks to global central bank rate cuts (the Fed and European Central Bank) and an increase in geopolitical tensions (especially with respect to the U.S. and Iran). Meanwhile, oil was volatile last quarter as short-lived geopolitically driven rallies related to the bombing of a Saudi Arabian oil production facility were offset by rising concerns over slowing global economic growth reducing future energy demand. |
| Switching to fixed income markets, bonds were broadly higher in the third quarter, as we’d expect given global rate cuts, rising concerns about future economic growth, and still subdued inflation readings. The leading benchmark for bonds (Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index) experienced solidly higher returns for the fourth straight quarter. Looking deeper into the fixed income markets, longer-duration bonds once again outperformed those with shorter durations which is a continuation of what we observed in the first half of 2019 and reflective of a market that is responding to the recent rate cuts and threats of potentially slowing economic growth. Corporate bonds saw solidly positive returns in the third quarter, although investment-grade bonds handily outperformed high-yield bonds, and that move to higher-quality corporate debt also underscored concerns about future economic growth and corporate earnings. |
| Fourth-Quarter Market Outlook |
| Once again, the S&P 500 successfully weathered an increase in volatility this past quarter, as positive current economic fundamentals, interest rate cuts, better-than-expected corporate earnings and renewed hope for resolution on U.S.-China trade helped the S&P 500 maintain strong year-to-date gains. However, the increase in volatility we saw in May, and again most recently in August, is an important reminder that while markets remain broadly resilient, risks to investment portfolios and the economy need to be carefully monitored. There are still multiple unknowns currently facing investors as we begin the final three months of 2019. First, the ongoing U.S.-China trade war is clearly the most important influence on the markets. And while there has been rising optimism for some sort of temporary resolution, the fact remains that the U.S. and China still have substantial tariffs in place on imports, with more potentially coming in December. Those tariffs continue to be a headwind on global economic growth, and slowing global growth is a risk to markets that we will continue to watch closely. Turning to the economy, the outlook remains uncertain. Currently, U.S. economic growth is solid and the envy of the world’s developed economies. And, accommodative policy by the Federal Reserve will continue to support that growth. However, Fed rate cuts don’t bring guarantees of sustained periods of economic growth, and the ongoing U.S.-China trade war paired with the reappearance of some concerning indicators, such as an inverted yield curve, mean we must remain vigilant in detecting any potential future economic slowdown. Finally, both domestic and geopolitical dramas require close watching over the coming months. Domestically, the impeachment inquiry of President Trump has the potential to weigh on investor sentiment, while internationally U.S.-Iran tensions are as high as they’ve been in years, and any conflict between the U.S. and Iran will almost certainly be a negative for stocks, broadly speaking. Bottom line, U.S. markets were resilient in the third quarter and the performance of most markets year to date remains impressive. However, our experience has taught us that while markets may be resilient, risks still need to be monitored closely, and so we will continue to do so as we have all year. What happens next with the U.S.-China trade war (will there be a trade truce?), Federal Reserve policy (will the Fed cut rates again in 2019?), and future economic growth (does the yield curve invert again?) will likely determine whether markets maintain, and potentially add to, year-to-date gains—or whether we see similar bouts of volatility like we did in May and August of this year. We understand that markets always face uncertainties at the start of a new quarter. We are committed to monitoring these situations, their impact on the markets and your portfolio. On a positive note, current corporate and economic fundamentals remain solid, and there is no imminent sign of recession in our opinion and it is those factors that determine the longer-term path of markets, not the latest political drama or salvo in the U.S.-China trade war. At Munn & Morris Financial Advisors, we understand that volatility, regardless of the cause, can be unnerving, even if it is historically typical. That’s why we remain committed to helping you navigate this ever-changing market environment, with a focused eye on ensuring we continue to make progress on achieving your long-term investment goals. Our years of experience in all types of markets (calm and volatile) have taught us that successful investing remains a marathon, not a sprint. That’s why we’ve worked diligently with you to establish an allocation target based on your financial position, risk tolerance, and investment time horizon. The strong market performance notwithstanding, we remain vigilant towards risks to portfolios and the economy, and we thank you for your ongoing confidence and trust. Rest assured that our entire team will remain dedicated to helping you successfully navigate this market environment. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions, comments, or to schedule a portfolio review. Sincerely, Roy Gray Munn & Morris Financial Advisors |
| All charts sourced from YCharts Disclosure This material was prepared by The Sevens Report for financial advisors use. Views expressed are not necessarily those of Raymond James or your financial Advisor and are subject to change without notice. Information contained herein was received from sources to be reliable, but accuracy is not guaranteed. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The NASDAQ composite is an unmanaged index of securities traded on the NASDAQ system. S&P GSCI Gold is an index tracking changes in the spot price for gold bullion. S&P GSCI Crude Oil is an index tracking changes in the spot price for crude oil. The S&P Mid-Cap 400® provides investors with a benchmark for mid-sized companies. The index, which is distinct from the large-cap S&P 500®, measures the performance of mid-sized companies, reflecting distinctive risk and return characteristics of this market segment. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), commonly known as “The Dow” is an index representing 30 stocks of companies maintained and reviewed by the editors of the Wall Street Journal. The Russell 2000 Index measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represent approximately 8% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index. The MSCI EAFE is designed to represent the performance of large and mid-cap securities across 21 developed markets, including countries in Europe, Australasia and the Far East, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The Index is available for a number of regions, market segments/sizes and covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each of the 21 countries. (The MSCI ACWI Index is designed to represent performance of the full opportunity set of large- and mid-cap stocks across 23 developed and 24 emerging markets. As of March 2018, it covers more than 2,400 constituents across 11 sectors and approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each market. The Barclays Capital US Aggregate Index is an unmanaged market value weighted performance benchmark for investment- grade fixed rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset backed, mortgage backed securities with a maturity of at least 1 year. The Barclays Capital 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Index includes all publicly issued zero-coupon U.S. Treasury Bills that have a remaining maturity of less than 3 months and more than 1 Month, are rated investment grade, and have $250 million or more of outstanding face value. In addition, the securities must be denominated in U.S. dollars and must be fixed rate and non-convertible. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures large and mid-cap representation across 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries*. With 1,151 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. *EM countries include: Brazil, Chile, Columbia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey and United Arab Emirates. The LBMA Gold Price (“Benchmark”) is owned by London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) and ICE Benchmark Administration (IBA) provide the auction platform, methodology as well as the overall administration and governance for the LBMA Gold Price. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Municipal Index covers the USD-denominated long-term exempt bond market. The index has four main sectors: state and local general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, insured bonds and pre-refunded bonds. The Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Bond Index measures the USD-denominated, high yield, fixed rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. Bonds from issuers with an emerging markets country of risk, based on Barclays EM country definition, are excluded. The Bloomberg Barclays US Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) Index tracks agency mortgage Backed passthrough securities (both fixed-rate and hybrid ARM) guaranteed by Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Fannie Mae (FNMA), and Freddie Mac (FHLMC). The index is constructed by grouping individual TBA-deliverable MBS pools into aggregates or generics based on program, coupon and vintage. The Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate Bond Index measures the investment grade, fixed rate, taxable corporate bond market. It includes USD denominated securities publicly issued by US and non-US industrial, utility and financial issuers. The ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index is part of a series of indices intended to assess the U.S. Treasury market. The index is market value weighted and is designed to measure the performance of US dollar denominated, fixed rate securities with minimum term to maturity greater than seven years and less than or equal to ten years. The ICE U.S. Treasury Bond Index Series TM has an inception date of December 31, 2015. Index history is available back to December 31, 2004. Inclusion of these indexes is for illustrative purposes only. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor’s results will vary and investing involves risk, and no strategy assures success. There is no assurance any of the trends mentioned will continue or forecasts will occur. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Bond prices and yields are subject to change based upon market conditions and availability. If bonds are sold prior to maturity, you may receive more or less than your initial investment. Holding bonds to term allows redemption at par value. There is an inverse relationship between interest rate movements and bond prices. Generally, when interest rates rise, bond prices fall and when interest rates fall, bond prices generally rise. Commodities’ investing is generally considered speculative because of the significant potential for investment loss. Their markets are likely to be volatile and there may be sharp price fluctuations even during periods when prices overall are rising. Investing in small-cap stocks generally involves greater risks, and therefore, may not be appropriate for every investor. Stocks of smaller or newer or mid-sized companies may be more likely to realize more substantial growth as well as suffer more significant losses than larger or more established issuers. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Sector investments are companies engaged in business related to a specific sector. They are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence. There are additional risks associates with investing in an individual sector, including limited diversification. |
Retired and Confident: 6 Questions Toward Financial Security
5 Steps to Plan for a Comfortable and Secure Retirement
Suddenly Single and Stuck: a Financial Guide for Unexpected Hardship
Empty Nesters: Celebrating Your New Normal
